Critical Incident Technique: A valuable research tool for early intervention

Author(s): University of Kentucky. National Early Childhood Transition Center;
Date Issued: May 2006
Publisher(s): University of Kentucky. National Early Childhood Transition Center
Description: An overview of Critical Incident Technique, a research method based on studying participants' experiences of critical incidents, and its use in a study of early childhood transition practices
show entire record ↓
Preparer(s): Rous, Beth; McCormick, Katherine
Funder(s): Special Education Programs (U.S.)
Source: Lexington: University of Kentucky, National Early Childhood Transition Center. Retrieved August 27, 2008, from http://www.ihdi.uky.edu/nectc/Documents/researchSpotlight/NECTCSpotlight2.pdf
Topics: Research & Evaluation Methods > Research Methods
Country: United States
hide record ↑


More Like This

what is this? These resources were found by comparing the title, description, and topics of the currently selected resource to the rest of the Research Connections holdings.

Using eco-mapping as a research tool Fact Sheets & Briefs
A critical incident study of the transition experience for young children with disabilities: Recounts by parents and professionals Reports & Papers
NECTC literature review process and guide Fact Sheets & Briefs
The Chicago Program Evaluation Project: C-PEP: What is C-PEP?: An independent evaluation of early childhood education conducted by Mathematica Policy Research, Inc. with funding support from McCormick Foundation Fact Sheets & Briefs
Preservice teachers conducting action research in early education centers Reports & Papers

Disclaimer: Use of the above resource is governed by Research Connections' Terms of Use.

Research Connections is supported by grant #90YE0104 from the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The contents are solely the responsibility of the National Center for Children in Poverty and the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, the Administration for Children and Families, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Google Translate