State assessment of internal controls: Final report [Executive summary]

Author(s): United States. Child Care Bureau;
Date Issued: May, 2007
Publisher(s): United States. Child Care Bureau
Description: A summary of a description of the development and pilot of the State Internal Control Self-Assessment Instrument, an instrument for assessing states' internal controls for preventing improper payments in their administration of the Child Care and Development Fund
show entire record ↓
Preparer(s): Walter R. McDonald & Associates
Funder(s): United States. Child Care Bureau
Source: Washington, DC: U.S. Child Care Bureau. Retrieved May 18, 2008, from http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/ccb/ccdf/ipi/saic/saic.pdf
Topics: Research & Evaluation Methods > Measures
hide record ↑

Related Resources

what is this? Related Resources include summaries, versions, or components of the currently selected resource, documents encompassing or employing it, or datasets/measures used in its creation.

State assessment of internal controls: Final report Reports & Papers


More Like This

what is this? These resources were found by comparing the title, description, and topics of the currently selected resource to the rest of the Research Connections holdings.

Second error rate pilot report [Executive summary] Executive Summary
NYSAN Program Quality Self-Assessment (QSA) tool survey report, executive summary Executive Summary
Second error rate pilot report Reports & Papers
NYSAN Program Quality Self-Assessment (QSA) tool survey report Reports & Papers
State survey analysis report [Executive summary] Executive Summary

Disclaimer: Use of the above resource is governed by Research Connections' Terms of Use.

Research Connections is supported by grant #90YE0104 from the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The contents are solely the responsibility of the National Center for Children in Poverty and the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, the Administration for Children and Families, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Google Translate