Funding children's services

Author(s): Cox, Eva;
Date Issued: 2007
Publisher(s): Sydney University Press
Description: A discussion of the influence of political ideology on child care funding policy in Australia
show entire record ↓
Editor(s): Hill, Elizabeth; Pocock, Barbara; Elliott, Alison
Source: In E. Hill, B. Pocock, & A. Elliott (Eds.), Kids count: Better early childhood education and care in Australia (pp. 272-288). Sydney, New South Wales, Australia: Sydney University Press. Retrieved February 29, 2008, from http://ses.library.usyd.edu.au/bitstream/2123/2149/3/KidsCoxCh13.pdf
Topics: International Child Care & Early Education > Single-Country Studies

Child Care & Early Education Philosophy & Theory

Financing & Funding
ISBN: 978-1-920898-70-0 : Unspecified , 1-920898-70-0 : Unspecified
hide record ↑

Related Resources

what is this? Related Resources include summaries, versions, or components of the currently selected resource, documents encompassing or employing it, or datasets/measures used in its creation.

Kids count: Better early childhood education and care in Australia Other


More Like This

what is this? These resources were found by comparing the title, description, and topics of the currently selected resource to the rest of the Research Connections holdings.

The problems with using the concept of ‘citizenship’ in early years policy Other
Western influences in Korean preschool education Reports & Papers
Early childhood education in China: The impact of political change Reports & Papers
The checkered history of federal child care regulation Other
Keeping mum: Childcare as a vote winning issue Fact Sheets & Briefs

Disclaimer: Use of the above resource is governed by Research Connections' Terms of Use.

Research Connections is supported by grant #90YE0104 from the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The contents are solely the responsibility of the National Center for Children in Poverty and the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, the Administration for Children and Families, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Google Translate