Head Start and pre-kindergarten in Pennsylvania: An investment in crime prevention

Author(s): Fight Crime: Invest in Kids Pennsylvania;
Date Issued: 2006
Publisher(s): Fight Crime: Invest in Kids Pennsylvania
Description: An argument for the cost-effectiveness of increased investment in Head Start and other quality pre-kindergarten programs in Pennsylvania, based on a review of findings from studies examining the beneficial effects of such programs on children’s school readiness and future criminal activity
show entire record ↓
Source: Harrisburg, PA: Fight Crime: Invest in Kids Pennsylvania. Retrieved October 1, 2007, from http://www.fightcrime.org/reports/paprek06.pdf
Topics: Child Care & Early Education Market > Economic & Societal Impact > Cost Benefit Analysis

Child Care & Early Education Market > Economic & Societal Impact > Crime Prevention

Programs, Interventions & Curricula > Interventions/Curricula > Comprehensive
hide record ↑


More Like This

what is this? These resources were found by comparing the title, description, and topics of the currently selected resource to the rest of the Research Connections holdings.

Preventing crime with pre-kindergarten: A critical investment in Pennsylvania’s safety Fact Sheets & Briefs
Preventing crime in Philadelphia: Investing in quality pre-kindergarten Other
Preventing crime in Pittsburgh: Investing in quality pre-kindergarten Other
Preventing crime with pre-kindergarten: A critical investment in Tennessee’s safety Fact Sheets & Briefs
Preventing crime with pre-kindergarten: A critical investment in Ohio’s safety Fact Sheets & Briefs

Disclaimer: Use of the above resource is governed by Research Connections' Terms of Use.

Research Connections is supported by grant #90YE0104 from the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The contents are solely the responsibility of the National Center for Children in Poverty and the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, the Administration for Children and Families, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Google Translate