Investing in the economic vitality of the District of Columbia through pre-k for all: Executive summary

Author(s): Belfield, Clive R.;
Date Issued: September, 2006
Publisher(s): Pre-k for All DC
Description: A summary of an analysis of the economic costs and benefits of providing universal prekindergarten in the District of Columbia
show entire record ↓
Funder(s): Pre-K Now (Washington, D.C.)
Source: Washington, DC: Pre-k for All DC. Retrieved June 21, 2007, from http://www.prekforalldc.org/documents/Pre-K_for_All_Executive_Summary.pdf
Topics: Child Care & Early Education Market > Economic & Societal Impact > Cost Benefit Analysis

Policies > Child Care & Early Education Policies > Universal Provision
hide record ↑

Related Resources

what is this? Related Resources include summaries, versions, or components of the currently selected resource, documents encompassing or employing it, or datasets/measures used in its creation.

Investing in the economic vitality of the District of Columbia through pre-k for all: Technical report Reports & Papers


More Like This

what is this? These resources were found by comparing the title, description, and topics of the currently selected resource to the rest of the Research Connections holdings.

The fiscal impacts of universal pre-k: Case study analysis for three states Reports & Papers
The economics of investing in New Mexico's state-funded pre-k program Executive Summary
Investing in high quality pre-k: A strategy for school success Fact Sheets & Briefs
Leadership matters: Governors' pre-k proposals: Fiscal year 2008 Other
The economics of investing in New Mexico's state-funded pre-k program Reports & Papers

Disclaimer: Use of the above resource is governed by Research Connections' Terms of Use.

Research Connections is supported by grant #90YE0104 from the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The contents are solely the responsibility of the National Center for Children in Poverty and the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, the Administration for Children and Families, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Google Translate