[Review of the book Pre-schools for all: A market solution]

Author(s): Tamburrini, Joan;
Date Issued: December 1995
Publisher(s): Blackwell Publishing
Description: A review of an argument for the privatization of the early education system for children ages 5 and under in England
show entire record ↓
Journal Title: British Journal of Educational Studies
Volume Number: 43
Issue Number: 4
Page Range: 484-485
Topics: International Child Care & Early Education > Single-Country Studies

Child Care & Early Education Market

Programs, Interventions & Curricula > Programs > Preschool
ISSN: 1467-8527 Electronic
0007-1005 Paper
Peer Reviewed: yes
hide record ↑

Related Resources

what is this? Related Resources include summaries, versions, or components of the currently selected resource, documents encompassing or employing it, or datasets/measures used in its creation.

Pre-schools for all: A market solution Other


More Like This

what is this? These resources were found by comparing the title, description, and topics of the currently selected resource to the rest of the Research Connections holdings.

[Review of the book Negotiating critical literacies with young children] Book Reviews
[Review of the book Early childhood matters: Evidence from the Effective Pre-School and Primary Education project] Book Reviews
[Review of the book Educating hearts and minds: Reflections on Japanese pre-school and elementary education] Book Reviews
Childcare in the pre-school years Fact Sheets & Briefs
Effective Pre-School and Primary Education 3-11 Project (EPPE 3-11): The effectiveness of primary schools in England in Key Stage 2 for 2002, 2003 and 2004 Reports & Papers

Disclaimer: Use of the above resource is governed by Research Connections' Terms of Use.

Research Connections is supported by grant #90YE0104 from the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The contents are solely the responsibility of the National Center for Children in Poverty and the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, the Administration for Children and Families, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Google Translate