Lack of consensus on how to evaluate programs for preschool children with disabilities leaves states floundering

Author(s): FPG Child Development Institute;
Date Issued: September, 2006
Publisher(s): FPG Child Development Institute
Description: A summary of a resource for state policymakers to help guide their decisions in terms of collaboratively designing and implementing accountability models for early childhood programs that result in accurate data
show entire record ↓
Source: (FPG Snapshot No. 32). Chapel Hill, NC: FGP Child Development Institute. Retrieved January 16, 2007, from http://www.fpg.unc.edu/~images/pdfs/snapshots/snap32.pdf
Topics: Children & Child Development > Special Needs Children & Special Child Populations > Special Needs

Research & Evaluation Methods > Evaluation Methods
Country: United States
hide record ↑

Related Resources

what is this? Related Resources include summaries, versions, or components of the currently selected resource, documents encompassing or employing it, or datasets/measures used in its creation.

Issues in designing state accountability systems Other


More Like This

what is this? These resources were found by comparing the title, description, and topics of the currently selected resource to the rest of the Research Connections holdings.

Does your organization welcome participants with disabilities?: A new assessment tool Reports & Papers
Starting early in the States: Applying the lessons of Early Head Start Fact Sheets & Briefs
A measure of engagement for children with intellectual disabilities in early childhood settings: A preliminary study Reports & Papers
Implementing randomized controlled trials in preschool settings that include young children with disabilities: Considering the context of Strain and Bovey Other
Early childhood teachers' ideas about including children with disabilities in programmes designed for typically developing children Reports & Papers

Disclaimer: Use of the above resource is governed by Research Connections' Terms of Use.

Research Connections is supported by grant #90YE0104 from the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The contents are solely the responsibility of the National Center for Children in Poverty and the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, the Administration for Children and Families, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Google Translate